Buying the f/2.8 version once is probably cheaper overall than buying the f/4 IS and then having to sell it to upgrade.


The f/2.8 IS is a beast though, most people aren't going to want to walk around with that much weight/bulk, or shoot for more than a little while with it.

__________________
See my user profile for gear information. Then forget about that stuff and go take pictures! And then some more pictures!

That was exactly my thought when deciding... I was going to pay ~$500 extra for a faster lens but I knew that this lens will be with me for a VERY long time so in the long run I would save money.

Also agree on this one but after I saw the results I got out of the AVP tournament the weight has become a non-issue... without any exaggeration after that day my shoulder was sore and I work out regularly!!! It is Heavy and the longer the shooting session the more you'll feel it but its sooo worth it.

OK I sound like a salesman!!! Good luck in your purchase and let us know what you went with.

I had the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 and it is a tank, but the picture quality is excellent. Here's one of my first test shots with it mounted on my XSi, taken handheld:


EDIT: Here's a link to the full-size image if you want to see all the detail: http://www.flickr.com/photos/absorpt...7616320892923/

The only reason I ended up selling it is because I didn't feel like I used it enough to justify the price.

__________________
http://www.flickr.com/absorption_line
http://www.tanyaharrisonofmars.com

Fantastic image Tanya!

__________________

it comes to life full size. didnt realize bees were so covered with pollen until i saw ur pic. Thanks you.

__________________

WoW great shot and the full size is even better!

__________________
.


.

"I've Got A Fever And The Only Prescription Is More Pictures"

For Quotes And Comissions Please Email Me.

Free San Diego MLS Search

San Diego Wedding and Portrait Photography



Last Activity: 1 Minute Ago
Current Activity: Banning Spammers

Thanks guys! I recommend the lens with the caution that it is awkwardly heavy. The weight is predominantly near the front of the lens thanks to the big glass, so holding it feels a bit strange compared to other large lenses that are even heavier but where the weight is more evenly distributed, like the Canon 100-400L.

(Hopefully that makes sense! )

__________________
http://www.flickr.com/absorption_line
http://www.tanyaharrisonofmars.com

Completely. I have an older version of the 70-210 and the 100-400L. Your comment about the balance in the L lens and the front weight of the 70-200 is right on target.

Love them both. 70-200 for speed, 100-400 for reach.

__________________
Without others thinking you are good, it doesn't matter how good you think you are.

http://dkbarto.daportfolio.com